Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

El significado ambivalente del reconocimiento del derecho a la especial protección en Colombia

Translated title of the contribution: The ambivalent meaning of the recognition of the right to special protection In Colombia

    Research output: Contribution to scientific journalArticle in an indexed scientific journalpeer-review

    2 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This article examines critically the meaning of the legal category of the right to special protection in the Colombian legal system and its relation with the theories of recognition. Firstly, the article argues that this category has a positive and negative meaning which needs to be understood as a political tool in permanent construction, and to be interpreted it in its various dimensions and subdivision. Secondly, the article argues that this right is based on the theories of recognition and, therefore, integrates and articulates to the tensions and problems of the forms of recognition. Thirdly, we present the opposite sides that are normally involved in this kind of legal recognition. From there, the article nurtures the idea, according to which, the right to special protection in Colombia promotes a model of formal and material recognition, not of disadvantaged subjects and groups, that represents their inequality by means of a new discourse of rights under which the old discourse of modern law hides, which, ultimately, ends up questioning the positive meaning of this category and reinforces its negative sense.

    Translated title of the contributionThe ambivalent meaning of the recognition of the right to special protection In Colombia
    Original languageSpanish
    Pages (from-to)249-290
    Number of pages42
    JournalVniversitas
    Volume66
    Issue number134
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jan 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ambivalent meaning of the recognition of the right to special protection In Colombia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this