TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of Cereal Bars Enriched with Andean Grains and Patagonian Calafate (Berberis microphylla)
T2 - Nutritional Composition, Phenolic Content, Antioxidant, Textural, and Sensory Evaluation
AU - López, Jéssica
AU - Cea, Romina
AU - Tiznado, Nicole
AU - Fernández, Evelyn
AU - González, María Lorena
AU - Pizarro-Oteíza, Sebastián
AU - Pérez-Cervera, Carmen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Cereal bars are convenient vehicles for incorporating ingredients with functional value. In this context, the study aimed to formulate bars enriched with quinoa, amaranth, and calafate (Berberis microphylla) and evaluate their instrumental texture, total phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity, nutritional composition, and sensory evaluation. Methods: Four formulations were developed, a baseline cereal bar with balanced ingredients (F1), a pseudocereal-enriched bar (F2), a high-calafate bar (F3), and an oat-only control bar (F4). Texture was measured using uniaxial compression, total phenolic compounds (TPC) were determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method, and antioxidant capacity was assessed by the DPPH assay. The nutritional composition was theoretically estimated using food composition tables and dietary reference intakes (DRIs). Sensory evaluation was performed using affective tests, including acceptability, preference, purchase intention, and sensory attributes. Results: The formulations differed significantly in instrumental hardness. F3 had the highest total phenol content and the highest antioxidant capacity. The estimated nutritional composition showed that the bars provide adequate energy and relevant micronutrients (Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn), as well as bioactive compounds from calafate. Sensory evaluation showed that F2 obtained the highest overall acceptance and the highest acceptability index. Purchase intention did not differ between formulations. In the evaluation of attributes, the results indicate that intermediate hardness maximizes acceptance, while softer (F1) or harder (F3–F4) bars are less preferred. Conclusions: The incorporation of calafate enhances the phenolic and antioxidant profile in F3, while an intermediate hardness linked to the greater use of expanded pseudocereals favors consumer acceptance in F2. The observed differences confirm that the formulation design enables the modulation of functional, mechanical, and sensory properties in cereal bars
AB - Cereal bars are convenient vehicles for incorporating ingredients with functional value. In this context, the study aimed to formulate bars enriched with quinoa, amaranth, and calafate (Berberis microphylla) and evaluate their instrumental texture, total phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity, nutritional composition, and sensory evaluation. Methods: Four formulations were developed, a baseline cereal bar with balanced ingredients (F1), a pseudocereal-enriched bar (F2), a high-calafate bar (F3), and an oat-only control bar (F4). Texture was measured using uniaxial compression, total phenolic compounds (TPC) were determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method, and antioxidant capacity was assessed by the DPPH assay. The nutritional composition was theoretically estimated using food composition tables and dietary reference intakes (DRIs). Sensory evaluation was performed using affective tests, including acceptability, preference, purchase intention, and sensory attributes. Results: The formulations differed significantly in instrumental hardness. F3 had the highest total phenol content and the highest antioxidant capacity. The estimated nutritional composition showed that the bars provide adequate energy and relevant micronutrients (Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn), as well as bioactive compounds from calafate. Sensory evaluation showed that F2 obtained the highest overall acceptance and the highest acceptability index. Purchase intention did not differ between formulations. In the evaluation of attributes, the results indicate that intermediate hardness maximizes acceptance, while softer (F1) or harder (F3–F4) bars are less preferred. Conclusions: The incorporation of calafate enhances the phenolic and antioxidant profile in F3, while an intermediate hardness linked to the greater use of expanded pseudocereals favors consumer acceptance in F2. The observed differences confirm that the formulation design enables the modulation of functional, mechanical, and sensory properties in cereal bars
KW - Amaranthussp
KW - antioxidant
KW - Berberis microphylla
KW - cereal bar
KW - Chenopodium quinoa
KW - nutritive value
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024582636
U2 - 10.3390/foods14234127
DO - 10.3390/foods14234127
M3 - Artículo en revista científica indexada
AN - SCOPUS:105024582636
SN - 2304-8158
VL - 14
JO - Foods
JF - Foods
IS - 23
M1 - 4127
ER -