TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter evaluation of mycobacteria identification by PCR restriction enzyme analysis in laboratories from Latin America and the Caribbean
AU - Leão, Sylvia Cardoso
AU - Bernardelli, Amelia
AU - Cataldi, Angel
AU - Zumarraga, Martin
AU - Robledo, Jaime
AU - Realpe, Teresa
AU - Mejía, Gloria Isabel
AU - Da Silva Telles, Maria Alice
AU - Chimara, Erica
AU - Velazco, Maritza
AU - Fernandez, Jorge
AU - Rodrigues, Pamela Araya
AU - Guerrero, Martha Inirida
AU - León, Clara Ines
AU - Porras, Tania Bibiana
AU - Rastogi, Nalin
AU - Goh, Khye Seng
AU - Suffys, Philip
AU - Da Silva Rocha, Adalgisa
AU - Dos Santos Netto, Diogo
AU - Ritacco, Viviana
AU - López, Beatriz
AU - Barrera, Lucia
AU - Palomino, Juan Carlos
AU - Martin, Anandi
AU - Portaels, Françoise
N1 - Funding Information:
This works was supported by INCO-CA project no. ICA4-CT-2001-10087 from the European Commission. V.R. is a member of the research career, CONICET, Argentina. E.C. is the recipient of a fellowship from CAPES, Brazil.
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - The identification of mycobacterial species in clinical isolates is essential for making patient care decisions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction enzyme analysis (PRA) is a simple and rapid identification method, based on amplification of 441 bp of the hsp65 gene and restriction with BstEII and HaeIII. As a contribution to the validation of PRA, a multicenter study was performed in eight laboratories located in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, and Guadeloupe. Each laboratory received 18 coded isolates from the collection of the Institute of Tropical Medicine (Antwerp, Belgium), representing duplicates of nine laboratory strains: Mycobacterium terrae CIPT 140320001, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum CIPT 140220031, Mycobacterium flavescens ATCC 14474, Mycobacterium triviale ATCC 23292, Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum ATCC 19530, Mycobacterium chitae ATCC 19627, Mycobacterium abscessus ATCC 19977, Mycobacterium kansasii ATCC 12478, and Mycobacterium peregrinum ATCC 14467. A detailed protocol including amplification, enzymatic digestion, and gel preparation was provided to each laboratory. Two laboratories identified correctly all 18 (100%) isolates, one identified correctly 17 (94.5%), two identified 14 (77.7%), one identified 11 (61%), and two identified 8 (44.4%) isolates. Errors detected in laboratories with more than 77% accuracy were associated with electrophoresis running conditions and an unspecific amplicon produced by a single strain. Lower accuracy was mainly related to inappropriate use of DNA markers and insufficient training in interpretation of patterns. In conclusion, the PRA method was readily implemented in some Latin American and Caribbean laboratories of mycobacteria, but improvements in critical points, as gel running conditions and training in interpretiation of patterns, are needed in order to improve accuracy. In others, improvement in critical points is still necessary.
AB - The identification of mycobacterial species in clinical isolates is essential for making patient care decisions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction enzyme analysis (PRA) is a simple and rapid identification method, based on amplification of 441 bp of the hsp65 gene and restriction with BstEII and HaeIII. As a contribution to the validation of PRA, a multicenter study was performed in eight laboratories located in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, and Guadeloupe. Each laboratory received 18 coded isolates from the collection of the Institute of Tropical Medicine (Antwerp, Belgium), representing duplicates of nine laboratory strains: Mycobacterium terrae CIPT 140320001, Mycobacterium scrofulaceum CIPT 140220031, Mycobacterium flavescens ATCC 14474, Mycobacterium triviale ATCC 23292, Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum ATCC 19530, Mycobacterium chitae ATCC 19627, Mycobacterium abscessus ATCC 19977, Mycobacterium kansasii ATCC 12478, and Mycobacterium peregrinum ATCC 14467. A detailed protocol including amplification, enzymatic digestion, and gel preparation was provided to each laboratory. Two laboratories identified correctly all 18 (100%) isolates, one identified correctly 17 (94.5%), two identified 14 (77.7%), one identified 11 (61%), and two identified 8 (44.4%) isolates. Errors detected in laboratories with more than 77% accuracy were associated with electrophoresis running conditions and an unspecific amplicon produced by a single strain. Lower accuracy was mainly related to inappropriate use of DNA markers and insufficient training in interpretation of patterns. In conclusion, the PRA method was readily implemented in some Latin American and Caribbean laboratories of mycobacteria, but improvements in critical points, as gel running conditions and training in interpretiation of patterns, are needed in order to improve accuracy. In others, improvement in critical points is still necessary.
KW - Mycobacterium
KW - PCR
KW - Species identification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844275967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.11.015
DO - 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.11.015
M3 - Artículo en revista científica indexada
C2 - 15722145
AN - SCOPUS:13844275967
SN - 0167-7012
VL - 61
SP - 193
EP - 199
JO - Journal of Microbiological Methods
JF - Journal of Microbiological Methods
IS - 2
ER -