TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasound-assisted puncture
T2 - does the technique reduce dependence on fluoroscopic ionizing radiation?
AU - Pulido-Contreras, Enrique
AU - Garcia-Padilla, Miguel Angel
AU - Medrano-Sanchez, Javier
AU - Leon-Verdin, Guadalupe
AU - Primo-Rivera, Miguel Angel
AU - Sur, Roger L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Purpose: The ultrasound-guided (US) puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has demonstrated advantages over traditional fluoroscopy access. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the reduction of fluoroscopy time using this technique during PCNL as the surgeon gained experience. Methods: Transversal study performed on 30 consecutive patients undergoing PCNL from March to November 2019. All punctures were performed with US guidance. The patients were divided into 2 groups of 15 each according to the chronological order of the intervention. Demographic data, preoperative parameters, puncture time, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate and complications were analyzed. Results: The time of fluoroscopy was considerably reduced as the experience in the number of cases increased, reducing from 83.09 ± 47.8 s in group 1 to 22.8 ± 10.3 s in group 2 (p < 0.01), the time required to perform the puncture was reduced of 108.1 ± 68.9 s in group 1, to 92.6 ± 94.7 s in group 2 (p < 0.67). Stone free rate of 83.3% was obtained globally. Conclusion: US percutaneous renal access is safe and reproducible technique; the main advantage is to reduce exposure to radiation without compromising clinical results and has a short learning curve for urologists with prior experience in PCNL.
AB - Purpose: The ultrasound-guided (US) puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has demonstrated advantages over traditional fluoroscopy access. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the reduction of fluoroscopy time using this technique during PCNL as the surgeon gained experience. Methods: Transversal study performed on 30 consecutive patients undergoing PCNL from March to November 2019. All punctures were performed with US guidance. The patients were divided into 2 groups of 15 each according to the chronological order of the intervention. Demographic data, preoperative parameters, puncture time, fluoroscopy time, stone-free rate and complications were analyzed. Results: The time of fluoroscopy was considerably reduced as the experience in the number of cases increased, reducing from 83.09 ± 47.8 s in group 1 to 22.8 ± 10.3 s in group 2 (p < 0.01), the time required to perform the puncture was reduced of 108.1 ± 68.9 s in group 1, to 92.6 ± 94.7 s in group 2 (p < 0.67). Stone free rate of 83.3% was obtained globally. Conclusion: US percutaneous renal access is safe and reproducible technique; the main advantage is to reduce exposure to radiation without compromising clinical results and has a short learning curve for urologists with prior experience in PCNL.
KW - Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
KW - Ultrasound guided PCNL
KW - Urolithiasis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101841740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-021-03636-2
DO - 10.1007/s00345-021-03636-2
M3 - Artículo en revista científica indexada
C2 - 33646346
AN - SCOPUS:85101841740
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 39
SP - 3579
EP - 3585
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 9
ER -